City of Elk Grove Event Sponsorship Grant Program should be an Equitable Process - Was preferential treatment given to former Mayor Gary Davis?

By Connie Conley |    One of the key functions of any local government is policy development and the city of Elk Grove is no differ...

By Connie Conley |   

One of the key functions of any local government is policy development and the city of Elk Grove is no different. Developing and implementing these policies are key elements which are critical to a local government’s function of peace, order and most certainly, good governance.

Processes are extremely vital when taxpayers’ monies are involved especially when it pertains to our local charities. Every year, through the grant funding process, the Elk Grove City Council decides and votes on which charities are to receive what taxpayer funds – funds which have decreased year after year. Therefore, these precious taxpayer dollars must be given out by a fair and equitable process absent of any preferential treatment or bias.  [Local charities must submit applications by a strict deadline in order to be considered for grant funding within any given fiscal year.]

The same is true with the event sponsorship funding which is also afforded charities through an application process. Those applications are also vetted by city staff, voted on and approved in an open meeting by the Elk Grove City Council before the public. . . or are they?  Is there a Catch 22 at play here?  Or at the very least, bending of the rules?

One look at both the Elk Grove CDBG & CSG Grant Funding - 2017-18 and the Event Sponsorship Grant Program Application – FY 2017-18 applications – see attached – you will see the applications are indeed arduous, lengthy, ask a lot of questions and require a lot of information and detail of both revenue and expenses. And rightfully so. The public should know exactly how the money is going to be spent. 

However, do the local charities know they can bypass the event sponsorship application process entirely? No Council approval and no public input if they submit their request via email, absent of any application process, midyear directly to Elk Grove City Manager Laura Gill; even though the application states to the contrary. That is exactly what occurred with the newly formed nonprofit public benefit charity, the Elk Grove Community Council.

Former Elk Grove Mayor Gary Davis, and President of the Elk Grove Community Council, took over the Elk Grove Hall of Fame – a proposal written by this author – and in doing so sent a one-page letter to Gill requesting a city of Elk Grove sponsorship for the upcoming Hall of Fame event.  Within a day of receiving the letter – see below – Gill approved a $5,000 sponsorship and authorized the check to be cut the very next day. 

Did Davis receive preferential treatment from Gill? An argument can be made that he did.  

In reviewing the Event Sponsorship Grant Program application – FY 2017-18, it states on Page 3, “Mid-year requestors must complete the Event Sponsorship Application, plus provide an explanation of why their organization could not have met the regular application deadline.”

Davis, as a former elected official, should know firsthand that good governance is about the processes for making and implementing decisions. It’s not only about making correct decisions, but about the best possible process for making those decisions. Some of the processes, I might add, Davis himself put into play during his 10-year tenure on the Elk Grove City Council.

That is why in making the request midyear for special event funding, and knowing what processes are in play, Davis should have, at the absolute minimum, filled out the same application required of all the other local nonprofit charities and he should not have been able to secure taxpayer monies with just a one page letter.

Davis’ completed application should have appeared, at the very least, on the Consent Calendar – not buried in the warrants – so that the public was aware of special funding approved solely by Gill. The same should also be true of any other midyear special event funding.  [It must be noted that Gill does have discretionary funding up to $5,000. However, that does not mean the public should be kept in the dark.]

Good governance is about accountability, transparency, is equitable, and should promote community confidence. There should be no preferential treatment whatsoever or bending of the rules. Community members are more likely to accept the outcomes if the process has been good, even if they don’t agree with the decision.  That did not occur with the event sponsorship funding Davis received. 

When any business of the people, including the city’s event sponsorship funding, is done outside of the public’s purview, and not according to written policy, it undermines the entire governmental process and fosters distrust.

Copyright © 2017 by Connie Conley. All rights reserved.


Politics & Government 6199617553595287102

Post a Comment

No vulgarity in your comments. If you use it, it will be deleted.


Follow Us

Most popular